Back to Search
Start Over
Complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with small peptides: deciding whether to deprotonate.
- Source :
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP); 10/14/2016, Vol. 18 Issue 38, p26923-26932, 10p
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- The observed variety of metal-ion complexation sites offered by peptides reflects a basic tension between charge solvation of the ion by Lewis-basic chelating groups versus amide nitrogen deprotonation and formation of metal–nitrogen bonds. Gas-phase models of metal-ion coordination can illuminate the factors governing this choice in condensed-phase proteins and enzymes. Here, structures of gas-phase complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with tri- and tetra-peptide ligands are mapped out using a combination of Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) computations. The two binding modes give distinctive IRMPD signatures, particularly in the diagnostic region 1500–1550 cm<superscript>−1</superscript>. Previous observations have suggested that Ni(ii) complexes preferentially show the iminol rearrangement pattern (Im) giving low-spin square-planar geometries with metal-ion bonds to deprotonated amide nitrogens. In contrast, alkaline earth metal ion complexes prefer amide carbonyl oxygens chelating the metal ion with pyramidal geometry (charge-solvation, CS). Surprisingly, it is shown here that the Gly<subscript>4</subscript> complexes are CS bound, in contrast with the expectation of Im binding. It is suggested that CS binding is actually a normal Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) binding mode to simple peptides lacking participating side chains. Three factors are suggested to influence the choice between CS and Im binding patterns: (1) presence of an accessible side-chain Lewis-basic proton interaction site (FGGF, FGG and HAA complexes); (2) short chain length of the peptide leading to a shortage of accessible carbonyl oxygen sites for CS binding, (AAA, FGG and HAA complexes); (3) outright deprotonation of the ligand giving net negatively charged Im[Ni<superscript>2+</superscript>(Gly<subscript>4</subscript>–3H<superscript>+</superscript>)]<superscript>−</superscript> and Im[Ni<superscript>2+</superscript>(Ala<subscript>3</subscript>–3H<superscript>+</superscript>)]<superscript>−</superscript> complexes, which have a triply-deprotonated ligand. IRMPD spectra of [Cu<superscript>2+</superscript>Gly<subscript>4</subscript>]<superscript>2+</superscript> and [Cu<superscript>2+</superscript>(Gly<subscript>4</subscript>–3H<superscript>+</superscript>)]<superscript>−</superscript> complexes suggest that their structures are similar to their Ni<superscript>2+</superscript> analogs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14639076
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 38
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 118462502
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp03974j