Back to Search
Start Over
A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany.
- Source :
- Infection; Oct2016, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p599-606, 8p, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant economic healthcare burden, especially the cost of recurrent disease. Fidaxomicin produced significantly lower recurrence rates and higher sustained cure rates in clinical trials. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in Germany in the first-line treatment of patient subgroups with CDI at increased risk of recurrence. Methods: A semi-Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin from a payer perspective in Germany. The model cycle length was 10 days. The time horizon was 1 year. Model inputs were probability of clinical cure, 30-day probability of recurrence, and 30-day attributable mortality based on evidence from two randomized controlled trials comparing fidaxomicin and vancomycin in patients with CDI. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, cost per bed-day saved, and cost per recurrence avoided. Results: Despite higher drug acquisition costs, fidaxomicin was dominant in the cancer subgroup (less costly and more effective) and cost-effective in the other subgroups, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios vs. vancomycin ranging from €26,900 to €44,500. Hospitalization costs of the first-line treatment of CDI with fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin were lower in every patient subgroup, resulting in budget impacts ranging from −€1325 (in patients ≥65 years) to −€2438 (in cancer patients). Reductions in the cost of treating recurrence with fidaxomicin ranged from −€574.32 per patient in those receiving concomitant antibiotics to −€1500.68 per patient in renally impaired patients. Conclusions: In patient subgroups with CDI at increased recurrence risk, fidaxomicin was cost-effective vs. vancomycin, and less costly and more effective in patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03008126
- Volume :
- 44
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Infection
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 118439633
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y