Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information?

<bold>Introduction: </bold>Although positron emission tomography PET-MR imaging is emerging into clinical practice, many aspects of this imaging technique such as attenuation correction have yet to be validated for myocardial imaging. Thus, it is uncertain whether PET-MR FDG images provide clinical information which is comparable to PET-CT FDG images. The study goal was to systematically compare relative myocardial FDG concentrations obtained from cardiac PET-MR images to those derived from same day PET-CT images.<bold>Methods: </bold>Myocardial FDG images of 27 patients undergoing PET-CT imaging, followed by PET-MR imaging 42 ± 13 minutes later as part of a prospective oncology study were analyzed. Mean segmental standardized uptake measurements (SUVmean) were obtained in each of the 17 standard myocardial segments and normalized to the brightest segment.<bold>Results: </bold>Normalized segmental SUVmean values did not differ significantly between the PET-MR and PET-CT images (mean difference 0.002, P = .826). The specific segment was a marginally significant predictor of the differences (P = .057), with the largest difference in the anteroseptal basal segment.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>PET-MR, vis-à-vis PET-CT, does not significantly raise segmental uptake relative to the brightest segment, suggesting that PET-MR can be used similarly to PET-CT for applications where relative uptake is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]