Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of quality of life using a tablet PC-based survey in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: a multi-institutional prospective randomized crossover comparison of paper and tablet PC-based questionnaires (KROG 12-01).

Authors :
Kim, Haeyoung
Park, Hee
Yoon, Sang
Kim, Tae
Kim, Jinsung
Kang, Min
Jung, Jinhong
Kim, Sang-Won
Yea, Ji
Park, Sung
Park, Young
Park, Hee Chul
Yoon, Sang Min
Kim, Tae Hyun
Kang, Min Kyu
Yea, Ji Woon
Park, Sung Ho
Park, Young Suk
Source :
Supportive Care in Cancer; Oct2016, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p4399-4406, 8p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>This study compared a tablet PC questionnaire with a paper method for reliability and patient preferences in the acquisition of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients treated with radiotherapy. By comparing the two modes of PRO administration, we aimed to evaluate the adequacy of using tablet PC questionnaires in future clinical use.<bold>Methods: </bold>Patients were randomized in a crossover study design using two different methods for PRO entry. A group of 89 patients answered a paper questionnaire followed by the tablet PC version, whereas 89 patients in another group completed the tablet PC questionnaire followed by the paper version. Surveys were performed four times per patient throughout the course of the radiotherapy. The Korean versions of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-K) and the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI-K) were used. The primary endpoint of our current study was an assessment of patient preference for the survey method. The proportions of patients preferring each mode of questionnaire were evaluated.<bold>Results: </bold>The proportion of patients who preferred the tablet PC version, paper form, or who had no preference was 52.2, 22.1, and 25.7 %, respectively. More than half of the patients preferred the tablet PC to the paper version in all four surveys. Age, gender, educational status, prior experience of using a tablet PC, and the order of paper to tablet PC administration did not impact patient preferences. Inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the modes were 0.92 for MDASI-K and 0.94 for BFI-K and ranged from 0.91 to 0.96 on both instruments during the four surveys.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A tablet PC-based PRO is an acceptable and reliable method compared with paper-based data collection for Korean patients receiving radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09414355
Volume :
24
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Supportive Care in Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
117605429
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3280-5