Back to Search Start Over

Patients' perception of types of errors in palliative care - results from a qualitative interview study.

Authors :
Kiesewetter, Isabel
Schulz, Christian
Bausewein, Claudia
Fountain, Rita
Schmitz, Andrea
Source :
BMC Palliative Care; 8/11/2016, Vol. 15, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Medical errors have been recognized as a relevant public health concern and research efforts to improve patient safety have increased. In palliative care, however, studies on errors are rare and mainly focus on quantitative measures. We aimed to explore how palliative care patients perceive and think about errors in palliative care and to generate an understanding of patients' perception of errors in that specialty. Methods: A semistructured qualitative interview study was conducted with patients who had received at least 1 week of palliative care in an inpatient or outpatient setting. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed according to qualitative content analysis. Results: Twelve patients from two centers were interviewed (7 women, median age 63.5 years, range 22-90 years). Eleven patients suffered from a malignancy. Days in palliative care ranged from 10 to 180 days (median 28 days). 96 categories emerged which were summed up under 11 umbrella terms definition, difference, type, cause, consequence, meaning, recognition, handling, prevention, person causing and affected person. A deductive model was developed assigning umbrella terms to error-theory-based factor levels (definition, type and process-related factors). 23 categories for type of error were identified, including 12 categories that can be considered as palliative care specific. On the level of process-related factors 3 palliative care specific categories emerged (recognition, meaning and consequence of errors). Conclusion: From the patients' perspective, there are some aspects of errors that could be considered as specific to palliative care. As the results of our study suggest, these palliative care-specific aspects seem to be very important from the patients' point of view and should receive further investigation. Moreover, the findings of this study can serve as a guide to further assess single aspects or categories of errors in palliative care in future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472684X
Volume :
15
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Palliative Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
117408525
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0141-4