Back to Search Start Over

Chemically Homogenous Compounds with Antagonistic Properties at All α1-Adrenoceptor Subtypes but not β1-Adrenoceptor Attenuate Adrenaline-Induced Arrhythmia in Rats.

Authors :
Pytka, Karolina
Lustyk, Klaudia
Żmudzka, Elżbieta
Kotańska, Magdalena
Siwek, Agata
Zygmunt, Małgorzata
Dziedziczak, Agnieszka
Śniecikowska, Joanna
Olczyk, Adrian
Gałuszka, Adam
Śmieja, Jarosław
Waszkielewicz, Anna M.
Marona, Henryk
Filipek, Barbara
Sapa, Jacek
Mogilski, Szczepan
Akar, Fadi G.
Heijman, Jordi
Baartscheer, Antonius
Source :
Frontiers in Pharmacology; 8/3/2016, p1-14, 14p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Studies proved that among all a<subscript>1</subscript>-adrenoceptors, cardiac myocytes functionally express only a<subscript>1A</subscript>- and a<subscript>1B</subscript>-subtype. Scientists indicated that a<subscript>1A</subscript>-subtype blockade might be beneficial in restoring normal heart rhythm. Therefore, we aimed to determine the role of a<subscript>1</subscript>-adrenoceptors subtypes (i.e., a<subscript>1A</subscript> and a<subscript>1B</subscript>) in antiarrhythmic effect of six structurally similar derivatives of 2-methoxyphenylpiperazine. We compared the activity of studied compounds with carvedilol, which is β<subscript>1</subscript>- and a<subscript>1</subscript>-adrenoceptors blocker with antioxidant properties. To evaluate the affinity for adrenergic receptors, we used radioligand methods. We investigated selectivity at a<subscript>1</subscript>-adrenoceptors subtypes using functional bioassays. We tested antiarrhythmic activity in adrenaline-induced (20 µg/kg i.v.), calcium chloride-induced (140 and 25 mg/kg i.v.) and barium chloride-induced (32 and 10 mg/kg i.v.) arrhythmia models in rats. We also evaluated the influence of studied compounds on blood pressure in rats, as well as lipid peroxidation. All studied compounds showed high affinity toward a<subscript>1</subscript>-adrenoceptors but no affinity for β<subscript>1</subscript> receptors. Biofunctional studies revealed that the tested compounds blocked a<subscript>1A</subscript>-stronger than a<subscript>1B</subscript>-adrenoceptors, but except for HBK-19 they antagonized a<subscript>1A</subscript>-adrenoceptor weaker than a<subscript>1D</subscript>-subtype. HBK-19 showed the greatest difference in pA<subscript>2</subscript> values--it blocked a<subscript>1A</subscript>-adrenoceptors around seven-fold stronger than a<subscript>1B</subscript> subtype. All compounds showed prophylactic antiarrhythmic properties in adrenaline-induced arrhythmia, but only the activity of HBK-16, HBK-17, HBK-18, and HBK-19 (ED<subscript>50</subscript> = 0.18-0.21) was comparable to that of carvedilol (ED<subscript>50</subscript> = 0.36). All compounds reduced mortality in adrenaline-induced arrhythmia. HBK-16, HBK-17, HBK-18, and HBK-19 showed therapeutic antiarrhythmic properties in adrenaline-induced arrhythmia. None of the compounds showed activity in calcium chloride- or barium chloride-induced arrhythmias. HBK-16, HBK-17, HBK-18, and HBK-19 decreased heart rhythm at ED<subscript>84</subscript>. All compounds significantly lowered blood pressure in normotensive rats. HBK-18 showed the strongest hypotensive properties (the lowest active dose: 0.01 mg/kg). HBK-19 was the only compound in the group, which did not show hypotensive effect at antiarrhythmic doses. HBK-16, HBK-17, HBK-18, HBK-19 showed weak antioxidant properties. Our results indicate that the studied 2-methoxyphenylpiperazine derivatives that possessed stronger a<subscript>1A</subscript>-adrenolytic properties (i.e., HBK-16, HBK-17, HBK-18, and HBK-19) were the most active compounds in adrenaline-induced arrhythmia. Thus, we suggest that the potent blockade of a<subscript>1A</subscript>-receptor subtype is essential to attenuate adrenaline-induced arrhythmia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16639812
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
117202795
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00229