Back to Search Start Over

Tower-Based Validation and Improvement of MODIS Gross Primary Production in an Alpine Swamp Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors :
Ben Niu
Yongtao He
Xianzhou Zhang
Gang Fu
Peili Shi
Mingyuan Du
Yangjian Zhang
Ning Zong
Source :
Remote Sensing; Jul2016, Vol. 8 Issue 7, p592, 19p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Alpine swamp meadow on the Tibetan Plateau is among the most sensitive areas to climate change. Accurate quantification of the GPP in alpine swamp meadow can benefit our understanding of the global carbon cycle. The 8-day MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) gross primary production (GPP) products (GPPαMOD) provide a pathway to estimate GPP in this remote ecosystem. However, the accuracy of the GPPαMOD estimation in this representative alpine swamp meadow is still unknown. Here five years GPPαMOD was validated using GPP derived from the eddy covariance flux measurements (GPPαEC) from 2009 to 2013. Our results indicated that the GPPαEC was strongly underestimated by GPPαMOD with a daily mean less than 40% of EC measurements. To reduce this error, the ground meteorological and vegetation leaf area index (LAI<subscript>G</subscript>) measurements were used to revise the key inputs, the maximum light use efficiency (ε<subscript>max</subscript>) and the fractional photosynthetically active radiation (FPARM) in the MOD17 algorithm. Using two approaches to determine the site-specific ε<subscript>max</subscript> value, we suggested that the suitable ε<subscript>max</subscript> was about 1.61 g C MJ<superscript>-1</superscript> for this alpine swamp meadow which was considerably larger than the default 0.68 g C MJ<superscript>-1</superscript> for grassland. The FPARM underestimated 22.2% of the actual FPAR (FPARG) simulated from the LAI<subscript>G</subscript> during the whole study period. Model comparisons showed that the large inaccuracies of GPPαMOD were mainly caused by the underestimation of the ε<subscript>max</subscript> and followed by that of the undervalued FPAR. However, the DAO meteorology data in the MOD17 algorithm did not exert a significant affection in the MODIS GPP underestimations. Therefore, site-specific optimized parameters inputs, especially the ε<subscript>max</subscript> and FPARG, are necessary to improve the performance of the MOD17 algorithm in GPP estimation, in which the calibrated MOD17A2 algorithm (GPPαMODR3) could explain 91.6% of GPPαEC variance for the alpine swamp meadow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20724292
Volume :
8
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Remote Sensing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
117069906
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070592