Back to Search
Start Over
Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee.
- Source :
- British Journal of Cancer; 6/28/2016, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p90-94, 5p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Accurate cause of death assignment is crucial for prostate cancer epidemiology and trials reporting prostate cancer-specific mortality outcomes.<bold>Methods: </bold>We compared death certificate information with independent cause of death evaluation by an expert committee within a prostate cancer trial (2002-2015).<bold>Results: </bold>Of 1236 deaths assessed, expert committee evaluation attributed 523 (42%) to prostate cancer, agreeing with death certificate cause of death in 1134 cases (92%, 95% CI: 90%, 93%). The sensitivity of death certificates in identifying prostate cancer deaths as classified by the committee was 91% (95% CI: 89%, 94%); specificity was 92% (95% CI: 90%, 94%). Sensitivity and specificity were lower where death occurred within 1 year of diagnosis, and where there was another primary cancer diagnosis.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>UK death certificates accurately identify cause of death in men with prostate cancer, supporting their use in routine statistics. Possible differential misattribution by trial arm supports independent evaluation in randomised trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00070920
- Volume :
- 115
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- British Journal of Cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 116463761
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.162