Back to Search
Start Over
Comment on Welch’s ‘Thy Thylacoleo is a thylacine’, Australian Archaeology , 80:40–47.
- Source :
- Australian Archaeology; Apr2016, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p55-59, 5p
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- In this paper, I review Welch’s critique (Australian Archaeology80:40–47) of claims by Akerman, Akerman and Willing and Woodhouse that depictions ofThylacoleoexist in Kimberley rock art. I agree with his conclusion that these claims are unfounded and that the depictions probably represent thylacines. There are, however, problems with the methodology he employs to reach this conclusion, a number of factual mistakes and a failure to adequately acknowledge the work of previous researchers. An appropriate methodology for identifying species in rock art, developed by a number of researchers in the 1970s and 1980s, is outlined. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Subjects :
- ARCHAEOLOGY
ROCK art (Archaeology)
ROCK paintings
THYLACOLEO
THYLACINE in art
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03122417
- Volume :
- 82
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Australian Archaeology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 116265266
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2016.1169583