Back to Search Start Over

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during and following caesarean section: a survey of clinical practice.

Authors :
Seeho, Sean K.M.
Nippita, Tanya A.
Roberts, Christine L.
Morris, Jonathan M.
Nassar, Natasha
Source :
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; Feb2016, Vol. 56 Issue 1, p54-59, 6p, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background Caesarean section ( CS) is a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism; however, the optimal method of thromboprophylaxis around the time of CS is unknown. Aims To examine current thromboprophylaxis practice during and following CS in Australia and New Zealand, and the willingness of obstetricians to participate in a randomised controlled trial ( RCT) comparing different methods of thromboprophylaxis after CS. Materials and Methods An online survey was sent to fellows and trainees of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Results There were 488 responses from currently practising obstetricians (response rate 23.4%). During CS, 48% and 80% of obstetricians recommended intermittent pneumatic compression ( IPC) and elastic stockings ( ES), respectively. Following CS, 96-97% of obstetricians recommended early ambulation, 87-90% recommended ES, 23-36% recommended IPC, and 42-65% recommended low molecular weight heparin ( LMWH) depending on clinical factors. Increased BMI ( OR 3.42; 95% CI 2.87-4.06), emergency CS ( OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.67-2.16) and older maternal age ( OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.26-1.49) were associated with more frequent LMWH use. Of obstetricians who prescribed LMWH, 70% adjusted the dose depending on maternal weight. LMWH therapy was most commonly recommended until discharge from hospital (31%), <5 days (24%) and 5-7 days (15%). Most obstetricians (58-79%) were willing to enrol women in a RCT, but less likely if the woman had an increased BMI or emergency CS. Conclusions There is considerable variation in clinical practice regarding thromboprophylaxis during and following CS. Obstetricians support a RCT to assess different methods of thromboprophylaxis following CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00048666
Volume :
56
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
112536693
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12393