Back to Search Start Over

Randomised controlled trial of mesalazine in IBS.

Authors :
Barbara, Giovanni
Cremon, Cesare
Annese, Vito
Basilisco, Guido
Bazzoli, Franco
Bellini, Massimo
Benedetti, Antonio
Benini, Luigi
Bossa, Fabrizio
Buldrini, Paola
Cicala, Michele
Cuomo, Rosario
Germanà, Bastianello
Molteni, Paola
Neri, Matteo
Rodi, Marcello
Saggioro, Alfredo
Scribano, Maria Lia
Vecchi, Maurizio
Zoli, Giorgio
Source :
Gut; Jan2016, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p82-90, 9p, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Objective: Low-grade intestinal inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of IBS. In this trial, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of mesalazine in patients with IBS. Design: We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, tertiary setting, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with Rome III confirmed IBS. Patients were randomly assigned to either mesalazine, 800 mg, or placebo, three times daily for 12 weeks, and were followed for additional 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was satisfactory relief of abdominal pain/ discomfort for at least half of the weeks of the treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was satisfactory relief of overall IBS symptoms. Supportive analyses were also performed classifying as responders patients with a percentage of affirmative answers of at least 75% or >75% of time. Results: A total of 185 patients with IBS were enrolled from 21 centres. For the primary endpoint, the responder patients were 68.6% in the mesalazine group versus 67.4% in the placebo group (p=0.870; 95% CI -12.8 to 15.1). In explorative analyses, with the 75% rule or >75% rule, the percentage of responders was greater in the mesalazine group with a difference over placebo of 11.6% (p=0.115; 95% CI -2.7% to 26.0%) and 5.9% (p=0.404; 95% CI -7.8% to 19.4%), respectively, although these differences were not significant. For the key secondary endpoint, overall symptoms improved in the mesalazine group and reached a significant difference of 15.1% versus placebo (p=0.032; 95% CI 1.5% to 28.7%) with the >75% rule. Conclusions: Mesalazine treatment was not superior than placebo on the study primary endpoint. However, a subgroup of patients with IBS showed a sustained therapy response and benefits from a mesalazine therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00175749
Volume :
65
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Gut
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
112005802
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308188