Back to Search Start Over

A multi-level qualitative analysis of Telehomecare in Ontario: challenges and opportunities.

Authors :
Hunting, Gemma
Shahid, Nida
Sahakyan, Yeva
Fan, Iris
Moneypenny, Crystal R.
Stanimirovic, Aleksandra
North, Taylor
Petrosyan, Yelena
Krahn, Murray D.
Rac, Valeria E.
Source :
BMC Health Services Research; 12/9/2015, Vol. 15, p1-15, 15p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Despite research demonstrating the potential effectiveness of Telehomecare for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Heart Failure, broad-scale comprehensive evaluations are lacking. This article discusses the qualitative component of a mixed-method program evaluation of Telehomecare in Ontario, Canada. The objective of the qualitative component was to explore the multi-level factors and processes which facilitate or impede the implementation and adoption of the program across three regions where it was first implemented.<bold>Methods: </bold>The study employs a multi-level framework as a conceptual guide to explore the facilitators and barriers to Telehomecare implementation and adoption across five levels: technology, patients, providers, organizations, and structures. In-depth semi-structured interviews and ethnographic observations with program stakeholders, as well as a Telehomecare document review were used to elicit key themes. Study participants (n = 89) included patients and/or informal caregivers (n = 39), health care providers (n = 23), technicians (n = 2), administrators (n = 12), and decision makers (n = 13) across three different Local Health Integration Networks in Ontario.<bold>Results: </bold>Key facilitators to Telehomecare implementation and adoption at each level of the multi-level framework included: user-friendliness of Telehomecare technology, patient motivation to participate in the program, support for Telehomecare providers, the integration of Telehomecare into broader health service provision, and comprehensive program evaluation. Key barriers included: access-related issues to using the technology, patient language (if not English or French), Telehomecare provider time limitations, gaps in health care provision for patients, and structural barriers to patient participation related to geography and social location.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Though Telehomecare has the potential to positively impact patient lives and strengthen models of health care provision, a number of key challenges remain. As such, further implementation and expansion of Telehomecare must involve continuous assessments of what is working and not working with all stakeholders. Increased dialogue, evaluation, and knowledge translation within and across regions to understand the contextual factors influencing Telehomecare implementation and adoption is required. This can inform decision-making that better reflects and addresses the needs of all program stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726963
Volume :
15
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
111521348
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1196-2