Back to Search
Start Over
Depicting the interplay between organisational tiers in the use of a national quality registry to develop quality of care in Sweden.
- Source :
- BMC Health Services Research; 11/25/2015, Vol. 15, p1-9, 9p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>With a pending need to identify potential means to improved quality of care, national quality registries (NQRs) are identified as a promising route. Yet, there is limited evidence with regards to what hinders and facilitates the NQR innovation, what signifies the contexts in which NQRs are applied and drive quality improvement. Supposedly, barriers and facilitators to NQR-driven quality improvement may be found in the healthcare context, in the politico-administrative context, as well as with an NQR itself. In this study, we investigated the potential variation with regards to if and how an NQR was applied by decision-makers and users in regions and clinical settings. The aim was to depict the interplay between the clinical and the politico-administrative tiers in the use of NQRs to develop quality of care, examining an established registry on stroke care as a case study.<bold>Methods: </bold>We interviewed 44 individuals representing the clinical and the politico-administrative settings of 4 out of 21 regions strategically chosen for including stroke units representing a variety of outcomes in the NQR on stroke (Riksstroke) and a variety of settings. The transcribed interviews were analysed by applying The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).<bold>Results: </bold>In two regions, decision-makers and/or administrators had initiated healthcare process projects for stroke, engaging the health professionals in the local stroke units who contributed with, for example, local data from Riksstroke. The Riksstroke data was used for identifying improvement issues, for setting goals, and asserting that the stroke units achieved an equivalent standard of care and a certain level of quality of stroke care. Meanwhile, one region had more recently initiated such a project and the fourth region had no similar collaboration across tiers. Apart from these projects, there was limited joint communication across tiers and none that included all individuals and functions engaged in quality improvement with regards to stroke care.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>If NQRs are to provide for quality improvement and learning opportunities, advances must be made in the links between the structures and processes across all organisational tiers, including decision-makers, administrators and health professionals engaged in a particular healthcare process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- MEDICAL registries
MEDICAL quality control
ORGANIZATIONAL structure
HEALTH policy
PUBLIC administration
DECISION making
DATA analysis
IMPLEMENTATION (Social action programs)
COOPERATIVENESS
PSYCHOLOGY of executives
INTERPROFESSIONAL relations
INTERVIEWING
MEDICAL care
MEDICAL personnel
PRACTICAL politics
QUALITY assurance
STROKE
QUALITATIVE research
ACQUISITION of data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14726963
- Volume :
- 15
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMC Health Services Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 111298680
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1188-2