Back to Search Start Over

mTOR-inhibitor treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: contribution of Choi and modified Choi criteria assessed in 2D or 3D to evaluate tumor response.

Authors :
Lamuraglia, M.
Raslan, S.
Elaidi, R.
Oudard, S.
Escudier, B.
Slimane, K.
Penna, R.
Wagner, M.
Lucidarme, O.
Penna, R Renard
Source :
European Radiology; Jan2016, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p278-285, 8p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>To determine whether 2D or 3D Choi and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria could assess the efficacy of everolimus against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).<bold>Methods: </bold>RECIST-1.1, Choi, and mChoi criteria were applied retrospectively to analyse baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in 48 patients with mRCC enrolled in the everolimus arm of the French randomized double-blind multicentre phase III trial comparing everolimus versus placebo (RECORD-1). The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed progression-free survival (PFS) calculated from the initial RECORD-1 analysis. Mean attenuation was determined for 2D target lesion regions of interest drawn on CECT sections whose largest diameters had been measured, and for the 3D whole target lesion.<bold>Results: </bold>The median PFS was 5.5 months. The median PFS for everolimus responders defined using 3D mChoi criteria was significantly longer than for non-responders (7.6 versus 5.4 months, respectively), corresponding to a hazard ratio for progression of 0.45 (95 % CI: 0.22-0.92), with respective 1-year survival rates of 31 % and 9 %. No other 2D or 3D imaging criteria at 2 months identified patients who would benefit from everolimus.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>At 2 months, only 3D mChoi criteria were able to identify mRCC patients with a PFS benefit from everolimus.<bold>Key Points: </bold>Choi criteria could not identify everolimus-treated patients with significantly prolonged PFS. mCHOI enabled identification of everolimus-treated mRCC patients with a PFS benefit. 3D attenuation measurement criteria appeared to perform better than single-slice measurement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
111289940
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3828-7