Back to Search Start Over

Validation of Six Short and Ultra-short Screening Instruments for Depression for People Living with HIV in Ontario: Results from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study.

Authors :
Choi, Stephanie K. Y.
Boyle, Eleanor
Burchell, Ann N.
Gardner, Sandra
Collins, Evan
Grootendorst, Paul
Rourke, Sean B.
null, null
Source :
PLoS ONE; 11/13/2015, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p1-20, 20p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective: Major depression affects up to half of people living with HIV. However, among HIV-positive patients, depression goes unrecognized 60–70% of the time in non-psychiatric settings. We sought to evaluate three screening instruments and their short forms to facilitate the recognition of current depression in HIV-positive patients attending HIV specialty care clinics in Ontario. Methods: A multi-centre validation study was conducted in Ontario to examine the validity and accuracy of three instruments (the Center for Epidemiologic Depression Scale [CESD<subscript>20</subscript>], the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K<subscript>10</subscript>], and the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale [PHQ<subscript>9</subscript>]) and their short forms (CESD<subscript>10</subscript>, K<subscript>6</subscript>, and PHQ<subscript>2</subscript>) in diagnosing current major depression among 190 HIV-positive patients in Ontario. Results from the three instruments and their short forms were compared to results from the gold standard measured by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (the “M.I.N.I.”). Results: Overall, the three instruments identified depression with excellent accuracy and validity (area under the curve [AUC]>0.9) and good reliability (Kappa statistics: 0.71–0.79; Cronbach’s alpha: 0.87–0.93). We did not find that the AUCs differed in instrument pairs (p-value>0.09), or between the instruments and their short forms (p-value>0.3). Except for the PHQ<subscript>2,</subscript> the instruments showed good-to-excellent sensitivity (0.86–1.0) and specificity (0.81–0.87), excellent negative predictive value (>0.90), and moderate positive predictive value (0.49–0.58) at their optimal cut-points. Conclusion: Among people in HIV care in Ontario, Canada, the three instruments and their short forms performed equally well and accurately. When further in-depth assessments become available, shorter instruments might find greater clinical acceptance. This could lead to clinical benefits in fast-paced speciality HIV care settings and better management of depression in HIV-positive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
10
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
110925670
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142706