Back to Search
Start Over
Alexander Technique Lessons or Acupuncture Sessions for Persons With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial.
- Source :
- Annals of Internal Medicine; 11/3/2015, Vol. 163 Issue 9, p653-662, 24p, 1 Diagram, 18 Charts, 3 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Management of chronic neck pain may benefit from additional active self-care-oriented approaches.<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate clinical effectiveness of Alexander Technique lessons or acupuncture versus usual care for persons with chronic, nonspecific neck pain.<bold>Design: </bold>Three-group randomized, controlled trial. (Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN15186354).<bold>Setting: </bold>U.K. primary care.<bold>Participants: </bold>Persons with neck pain lasting at least 3 months, a score of at least 28% on the Northwick Park Questionnaire (NPQ) for neck pain and associated disability, and no serious underlying pathology.<bold>Intervention: </bold>12 acupuncture sessions or 20 one-to-one Alexander lessons (both 600 minutes total) plus usual care versus usual care alone.<bold>Measurements: </bold>NPQ score (primary outcome) at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months (primary end point) and Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale score, quality of life, and adverse events (secondary outcomes).<bold>Results: </bold>517 patients were recruited, and the median duration of neck pain was 6 years. Mean attendance was 10 acupuncture sessions and 14 Alexander lessons. Between-group reductions in NPQ score at 12 months versus usual care were 3.92 percentage points for acupuncture (95% CI, 0.97 to 6.87 percentage points) (P = 0.009) and 3.79 percentage points for Alexander lessons (CI, 0.91 to 6.66 percentage points) (P = 0.010). The 12-month reductions in NPQ score from baseline were 32% for acupuncture and 31% for Alexander lessons. Participant self-efficacy improved for both interventions versus usual care at 6 months (P < 0.001) and was significantly associated (P < 0.001) with 12-month NPQ score reductions (acupuncture, 3.34 percentage points [CI, 2.31 to 4.38 percentage points]; Alexander lessons, 3.33 percentage points [CI, 2.22 to 4.44 percentage points]). No reported serious adverse events were considered probably or definitely related to either intervention.<bold>Limitation: </bold>Practitioners belonged to the 2 main U.K.-based professional associations, which may limit generalizability of the findings.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Acupuncture sessions and Alexander Technique lessons both led to significant reductions in neck pain and associated disability compared with usual care at 12 months. Enhanced self-efficacy may partially explain why longer-term benefits were sustained.<bold>Primary Funding Source: </bold>Arthritis Research UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- NECK pain treatment
ACUPUNCTURE
ALEXANDER technique
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
HEALTH self-care
QUALITY of life
CHRONIC pain treatment
CHRONIC pain
DRUGS
HOSPITAL care
MEDICAL appointments
MEDICAL care costs
NECK pain
PATIENT compliance
QUESTIONNAIRES
RESEARCH funding
STATISTICAL sampling
SELF-efficacy
TREATMENT effectiveness
ECONOMICS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00034819
- Volume :
- 163
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 110691015
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-0667