Back to Search Start Over

SEMIQUANTITATIVE COUGH STRENGTH SCORE FOR PREDICTING REINTUBATION AFTER PLANNED EXTUBATION.

Authors :
Jun Duan
Lintong Zhou
Meiling Xiao
Source :
American Journal of Critical Care; Nov2015, Vol. 24 Issue 6, pe86-e90, 5p, 5 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background Semiquantitative cough strength score (SCSS, graded 0-5) and cough peak flow (CPF) have been used to predict extubation outcome in patients in whom extubation is planned; however, the correlation of the 2 assessments is unclear. Methods In the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital, 186 patients who were ready for extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled in the study. Both SCSS and CPF were assessed before extubation. Reintubation was recorded 72 hours after extubation. Results Reintubation rate was 15.1% within 72 hours after planned extubation. Patients in whom extubation was successful had higher SCSSs than did reintubated patients (mean [SD], 3.2 [1.6] vs 2.2 [1.6], P=.002) and CPF (74.3 [40.0] vs 51.7 [29.4] L/min, P= .005). The SCSS showed a positive correlation with CPF (r=0.69, P<.001). Mean CPFs were 38.36 L/min, 39.51 L/min, 44.67 L/min, 57.54 L/min, 78.96 L/min, and 113.69 L/min in patients with SCSSs of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The discriminatory power for reintubation, evidenced by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was similar: 0.677 for SCSS and 0.678 for CPF (P=.97). As SCSS increased (from 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5), the reintubation rate decreased (from 29.4% to 25.0% to 19.4% to 16.1% to 13.2% to 4.1%). Conclusions SCSS was convenient to measure at the bedside. It was positively correlated with CPF and had the same accuracy for predicting reintubation after planned extubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10623264
Volume :
24
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
American Journal of Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
110372715
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015172