Back to Search Start Over

Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.

Authors :
Macleod, Malcolm R.
Lawson McLean, Aaron
Kyriakopoulou, Aikaterini
Serghiou, Stylianos
de Wilde, Arno
Sherratt, Nicki
Hirst, Theo
Hemblade, Rachel
Bahor, Zsanett
Nunes-Fonseca, Cristina
Potluru, Aparna
Thomson, Andrew
Baginskitae, Julija
Egan, Kieren
Vesterinen, Hanna
Currie, Gillian L.
Churilov, Leonid
Howells, David W.
Sena, Emily S.
Source :
PLoS Biology; 10/13/2015, Vol. 13 Issue 10, p1-12, 12p, 1 Chart, 5 Graphs
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The reliability of experimental findings depends on the rigour of experimental design. Here we show limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in a random sample of life sciences publications, significantly lower reporting of randomisation in work published in journals of high impact, and very limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in publications from leading United Kingdom institutions. Ascertainment of differences between institutions might serve both as a measure of research quality and as a tool for institutional efforts to improve research quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15449173
Volume :
13
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
PLoS Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
110313050
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273