MEASURING SOCIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY: A REVIEW AND A PROPOSAL.

This article discusses the measurement of sociological productivity. One of the focuses of empirical investigations in the sociology of sociology has been publication output. In reading the literature on the productivity of sociologists, however, one becomes aware of a lack of research continuity. While numerous data have been reported, they have been not cumulative but, rather, ambiguous and often contradictory. One of the major obstacles to linking the results of the various studies together is the disparate procedures that have been employed to measure productivity. One measure with potential as an index of publication quantity was developed by Glenn and Villemez in research concerned with the productivity of American Graduate departments of sociology. The Glenn-Villemez Comprehensive Index (GVCI) was designed to cover a wider range of publications than most previously published indexes had covered. As originally formulated, the GVCI included all articles in twenty-two journals of sociology and allied fields. By means of a mailed questionnaire to a sample of professors of sociology Glenn and Villemez derived a system of weighting the various types of publications. A number of arguments can be made for the use of the GVCI as a measure of productivity. One is that it is composed of a broad range of journals and circumscribes most general sociological work as well as important specialty areas within discipline.