Antiemetic prophylaxis for office-based surgery: are the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists beneficial?

MLA

Tang J, et al. “Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Office-Based Surgery: Are the 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists Beneficial?” Anesthesiology, vol. 98, no. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 293–98. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edb&AN=106865562&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Tang J, Chen X, White PF, Wender RH, Ma H, Sloninsky A, Naruse R, Kariger R, Webb T, Zaentz A, Tang, J., Chen, X., White, P. F., Wender, R. H., Ma, H., Sloninsky, A., Naruse, R., Kariger, R., Webb, T., & Zaentz, A. (2003). Antiemetic prophylaxis for office-based surgery: are the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists beneficial? Anesthesiology, 98(2), 293–298.

Chicago

Tang J, Chen X, White PF, Wender RH, Ma H, Sloninsky A, Naruse R, et al. 2003. “Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Office-Based Surgery: Are the 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists Beneficial?” Anesthesiology 98 (2): 293–98. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edb&AN=106865562&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.