.VO2 kinetics during supramaximal exercise: relationship with oxygen deficit and 800-m running performance.

The aim of this study was to compare .VO2 kinetics of highly- versus recreationally-trained subjects during a constant velocity test of supramaximal intensity. Eighteen trained male subjects were recruited to one of two groups: highly trained (HT, n = 8, .VO(2max) = 70.1 +/- 6.5 ml . min (-1) . kg (-1)) and recreationally trained (RT, n = 10, .VO(2max) = 63.2 +/- 6.4 ml . min (-1) . kg (-1)). All subjects performed an incremental test to exhaustion for the determination of .VO(2max) and peak treadmill velocity (PTV), two constant velocity tests at 110% of PTV to determine .VO2 kinetics and oxygen deficit (O(2)def), and a 800-m time trial to determine running performance (mean velocity over the distance, V (800 m)). We found significant differences between HT and RT for the on-transient of the .VO2 response (tau, 24.7 +/- 3.3 and 30.9 +/- 7.0 s, respectively), the amplitude of the .VO2 response (60.0 +/- 5.0 and 53.5 +/- 5.7 ml . min (-1) . kg (-1), respectively) and V (800 m) (6.27 +/- 2.1 and 5.45 +/- 0.38 m . s (-1), respectively). O(2)def (24.6 +/- 2.7 and 27.7 +/- 7.8 ml . kg (-1), respectively) and the gain of the .VO2 response (193 +/- 14 and 194 +/- 13 ml . kg (-1) . m (-1), respectively) were similar between groups. tau was associated with O(2)def (r = 0.90, p < 0.05), but not with V (800 m) (r = 0.30, p > 0.05). It was concluded that HT subjects exhibited faster on-kinetics and higher amplitude than their RT counterparts. The higher amplitude was not thought to reflect any difference in underlying physiological mechanisms. The faster tau, whose exact mechanisms remain to be elucidated, may have practical implications for coaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]