Back to Search Start Over

Cell-free hemoglobin-based blood substitutes and risk of myocardial infarction and death: a meta-analysis.

Authors :
Natanson C
Kern SJ
Lurie P
Banks SM
Wolfe SM
Natanson, Charles
Kern, Steven J
Lurie, Peter
Banks, Steven M
Wolfe, Sidney M
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association; 5/21/2008, Vol. 299 Issue 19, p2304-2312, 9p
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

<bold>Context: </bold>Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) are infusible oxygen-carrying liquids that have long shelf lives, have no need for refrigeration or cross-matching, and are ideal for treating hemorrhagic shock in remote settings. Some trials of HBBSs during the last decade have reported increased risks without clinical benefit.<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess the safety of HBBSs in surgical, stroke, and trauma patients.<bold>Data Sources: </bold>PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searches for articles using hemoglobin and blood substitutes from 1980 through March 25, 2008; reviews of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee meeting materials; and Internet searches for company press releases.<bold>Study Selection: </bold>Randomized controlled trials including patients aged 19 years and older receiving HBBSs therapeutically. The database searches yielded 70 trials of which 13 met these criteria; in addition, data from 2 other trials were reported in 2 press releases, and additional data were included in 1 relevant FDA review.<bold>Data Extraction: </bold>Data on death and myocardial infarction (MI) as outcome variables.<bold>Results: </bold>Sixteen trials involving 5 different products and 3711 patients in varied patient populations were identified. A test for heterogeneity of the results of these trials was not significant for either mortality or MI (for both, I2 = 0%, P > or = .60), and data were combined using a fixed-effects model. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of death (164 deaths in the HBBS-treated groups and 123 deaths in the control groups; relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.61) and risk of MI (59 MIs in the HBBS-treated groups and 16 MIs in the control groups; RR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.67-4.40) with these HBBSs. Subgroup analysis of these trials indicated the increased risk was not restricted to a particular HBBS or clinical indication.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Based on the available data, use of HBBSs is associated with a significantly increased risk of death and MI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
299
Issue :
19
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105546724
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.19.jrv80007