Back to Search Start Over

Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial.

Authors :
Holbrook A
Thabane L
Keshavjee K
Dolovich L
Bernstein B
Chan D
Troyan S
Foster G
Gerstein H
COMPETE II Investigators
Holbrook, Anne
Thabane, Lehana
Keshavjee, Karim
Dolovich, Lisa
Bernstein, Bob
Chan, David
Troyan, Sue
Foster, Gary
Gerstein, Hertzel
Source :
Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ); 7/7/2009, Vol. 181 Issue 1/2, p37-44, 8p
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Diabetes mellitus is a complex disease with serious complications. Electronic decision support, providing information that is shared and discussed by both patient and physician, encourages timely interventions and may improve the management of this chronic disease. However, it has rarely been tested in community-based primary care.<bold>Methods: </bold>In this pragmatic randomized trial, we randomly assigned adult primary care patients with type 2 diabetes to receive the intervention or usual care. The intervention involved shared access by the primary care provider and the patient to a Web-based, colour-coded diabetes tracker, which provided sequential monitoring values for 13 diabetes risk factors, their respective targets and brief, prioritized messages of advice. The primary outcome measure was a process composite score. Secondary outcomes included clinical composite scores, quality of life, continuity of care and usability. The outcome assessors were blinded to each patient's intervention status.<bold>Results: </bold>We recruited sequentially 46 primary care providers and then 511 of their patients (mean age 60.7 [standard deviation 12.5] years). Mean follow-up was 5.9 months. The process composite score was significantly better for patients in the intervention group than for control patients (difference 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.75, p < 0.001); 61.7% (156/253) of patients in the intervention group, compared with 42.6% (110/258) of control patients, showed improvement (difference 19.1%, p < 0.001). The clinical composite score also had significantly more variables with improvement for the intervention group (0.59, 95% CI 0.09-1.10, p = 0.02), including significantly greater declines in blood pressure (-3.95 mm Hg systolic and -2.38 mm Hg diastolic) and glycated hemoglobin (-0.2%). Patients in the intervention group reported greater satisfaction with their diabetes care.<bold>Interpretation: </bold>A shared electronic decision-support system to support the primary care of diabetes improved the process of care and some clinical markers of the quality of diabetes care. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00813085.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08203946
Volume :
181
Issue :
1/2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105375767
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081272