Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial.

MLA

Shaw LJ, et al. “Comparative Effectiveness of Exercise Electrocardiography with or without Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) Trial.” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 11, Sept. 2011, pp. 1239–49. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.029660.

APA

Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, Hachamovitch R, Arrighi JA, Merz CN, Gibbons RJ, Wenger NK, Heller GV, WOMEN Trial Investigators, Shaw, L. J., Mieres, J. H., Hendel, R. H., Boden, W. E., Gulati, M., Veledar, E., & Hachamovitch, R. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial. Circulation, 124(11), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.029660

Chicago

Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, Hachamovitch R, et al. 2011. “Comparative Effectiveness of Exercise Electrocardiography with or without Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) Trial.” Circulation 124 (11): 1239–49. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.029660.