Back to Search Start Over

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress.

Authors :
Schuster A
Kutty S
Padiyath A
Parish V
Gribben P
Danford DA
Makowski MR
Bigalke B
Beerbaum P
Nagel E
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Elsevier B.V. ); 2011, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p8p-8p, 1p
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DS-CMR) is an established tool to assess hibernating myocardium and ischemia. Analysis is typically based on visual assessment with considerable operator dependency. CMR myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) is a recently introduced technique for tissue voxel motion tracking on standard steady-state free precession (SSFP) images to derive circumferential and radial myocardial mechanics.We sought to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of CMR-FT for quantitative wall motion assessment during intermediate dose DS-CMR.METHODS:10 healthy subjects were studied at 1.5 Tesla. Myocardial strain parameters were derived from SSFP cine images using dedicated CMR-FT software (Diogenes MRI prototype; Tomtec; Germany). Right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (EllRV and EllLV) and LV long-axis radial strain (ErrLAX) were derived from a 4-chamber view at rest. LV short-axis circumferential strain (EccSAX) and ErrSAX; LV ejection fraction (EF) and volumes were analyzed at rest and during dobutamine stress (10 and 20 microg · kg-1· min-1).RESULTS:In all volunteers strain parameters could be derived from the SSFP images at rest and stress. EccSAX values showed significantly increased contraction with DSMR (rest: -24.1 +/- 6.7; 10 microg: -32.7 +/- 11.4; 20 microg: -39.2 +/- 15.2; p < 0.05). ErrSAX increased significantly with dobutamine (rest: 19.6 +/- 14.6; 10 microg: 31.8 +/- 20.9; 20 microg: 42.4 +/- 25.5; p < 0.05). In parallel with these changes; EF increased significantly with dobutamine (rest: 56.9 +/- 4.4%; 10 microg: 70.7 +/- 8.1; 20 microg: 76.8 +/- 4.6; p < 0.05). Observer variability was best for LV circumferential strain (EccSAX ) and worst for RV longitudinal strain (EllRV) as determined by 95% confidence intervals of the difference.CONCLUSIONS:CMR-FT reliably detects quantitative wall motion and strain derived from SSFP cine imaging that corresponds to inotropic stimulation. The current implementation may need improvement to reduce observer-induced variance. Within a given CMR lab; this novel technique holds promise of easy and fast quantification of wall mechanics and strain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532429X
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Elsevier B.V. )
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104601358