Back to Search Start Over

A randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a low-glycemic index diet on pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors :
Louie JC
Markovic TP
Perera N
Foote D
Petocz P
Ross GP
Brand-Miller JC
Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
Markovic, Tania P
Perera, Nimalie
Foote, Deborah
Petocz, Peter
Ross, Glynis P
Brand-Miller, Jennie C
Source :
Diabetes Care; Nov2011, Vol. 34 Issue 11, p2341-2346, 6p
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising. There is little evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of one dietary therapy over another. We aimed to investigate the effect of a low-glycemic index (LGI) versus a conventional high-fiber diet on pregnancy outcomes, neonatal anthropometry, and maternal metabolic profile in GDM.<bold>Research Design and Methods: </bold>Ninety-nine women (age 26-42 years; mean ± SD prepregnancy BMI 24 ± 5 kg/m²) diagnosed with GDM at 20-32 weeks' gestation were randomized to follow either an LGI (n = 50; target glycemic index [GI] ~50) or a high-fiber moderate-GI diet (HF) (n = 49; target GI ~60). Dietary intake was assessed by 3-day food records. Pregnancy outcomes were collected from medical records.<bold>Results: </bold>The LGI group achieved a modestly lower GI than the HF group (mean ± SEM 47 ± 1 vs. 53 ± 1; P < 0.001). At birth, there was no significant difference in birth weight (LGI 3.3 ± 0.1 kg vs. HF 3.3 ± 0.1 kg; P = 0.619), birth weight centile (LGI 52.5 ± 4.3 vs. HF 52.2 ± 4.0; P = 0.969), prevalence of macrosomia (LGI 2.1% vs. HF 6.7%; P = 0.157), insulin treatment (LGI 53% vs. HF 65%; P = 0.251), or adverse pregnancy outcomes.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In intensively monitored women with GDM, an LGI diet and a conventional HF diet produce similar pregnancy outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01495992
Volume :
34
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diabetes Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104591440
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0985