Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of circulating tumor cells and serum markers for progression-free survival prediction in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective observational study.

Authors :
Bidard, François-Clément
Hajage, David
Bachelot, Thomas
Delaloge, Suzette
Brain, Etienne
Campone, Mario
Cottu, Paul
Beuzeboc, Philippe
Rolland, Emilie
Mathiot, Claire
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Source :
Breast Cancer Research; 2012, Vol. 14 Issue 1, pR29-R29, 1p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

<bold>Introduction: </bold>Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have been recently proposed as a new dynamic blood marker whose positivity at baseline is a prognostic factor and whose changes under treatment are correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, serum marker levels are also used for the same purpose, and no clear comparison has been reported to date.<bold>Methods: </bold>The IC 2006-04 enrolled prospectively 267 metastatic breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy and confirmed that CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor for PFS and overall survival (OS). A secondary pre-planned endpoint was to compare prospectively the positivity rates and the value of CTC (CellSearch®), of serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 15.3 (CA 15-3), CYFRA 21-1), and of serum non-tumor markers (lactate deshydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)) at baseline and under treatment for PFS prediction, independently from the other known prognostic factors, using univariate analyses and concordance indexes.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 90% of the patients had at least one elevated blood marker. Blood markers were correlated with poor performance status, high number of metastatic sites and with each other. In particular, CYFRA 21-1, a marker usually used in lung cancer, was elevated in 65% of patients. A total of 86% of patients had either CA 15-3 and/or CYFRA 21-1 elevated at baseline. Each serum marker was associated, when elevated at baseline, with a significantly shorter PFS. Serum marker changes during treatment, assessed either between baseline and week 3 or between baseline and weeks 6 to 9, were significantly associated with PFS, as reported for CTC. Concordance indexes comparison showed no clear superiority of any of the serum marker or CTC for PFS prediction.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>For the purpose of PFS prediction by measuring blood marker changes during treatment, currently available blood-derived markers (CTC and serum markers) had globally similar performances. Besides CEA and CA 15-3, CYFRA 21-1 is commonly elevated in metastatic breast cancer and has a strong prognostic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14655411
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Breast Cancer Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104371419
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3114