Back to Search Start Over

Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Johnston BC
Ma SS
Goldenberg JZ
Thorlund K
Vandvik PO
Loeb M
Guyatt GH
Johnston, Bradley C
Ma, Stephanie S Y
Goldenberg, Joshua Z
Thorlund, Kristian
Vandvik, Per O
Loeb, Mark
Guyatt, Gordon H
Source :
Annals of Internal Medicine; 12/18/2012, Vol. 157 Issue 12, p878-888, 11p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Antibiotic treatment may disturb the resistance of gastrointestinal flora to colonization. This may result in complications, the most serious of which is Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD).<bold>Purpose: </bold>To assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the prevention of CDAD in adults and children receiving antibiotics.<bold>Data Sources: </bold>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Web of Science, and 12 gray-literature sources.<bold>Study Selection: </bold>Randomized, controlled trials including adult or pediatric patients receiving antibiotics that compared any strain or dose of a specified probiotic with placebo or with no treatment control and reported the incidence of CDAD.<bold>Data Extraction: </bold>Two reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles; extracted data on populations, interventions, and outcomes; and assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines were used to independently rate overall confidence in effect estimates for each outcome.<bold>Data Synthesis: </bold>Twenty trials including 3818 participants met the eligibility criteria. Probiotics reduced the incidence of CDAD by 66% (pooled relative risk, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.49]; I(2) = 0%). In a population with a 5% incidence of antibiotic-associated CDAD (median control group risk), probiotic prophylaxis would prevent 33 episodes (CI, 25 to 38 episodes) per 1000 persons. Of probiotic-treated patients, 9.3% experienced adverse events, compared with 12.6% of control patients (relative risk, 0.82 [CI, 0.65 to 1.05]; I(2) = 17%).<bold>Limitations: </bold>In 13 trials, data on CDAD were missing for 5% to 45% of patients. The results were robust to worst-plausible assumptions regarding event rates in studies with missing outcome data.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Moderate-quality evidence suggests that probiotic prophylaxis results in a large reduction in CDAD without an increase in clinically important adverse events.<bold>Primary Funding Source: </bold>None. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034819
Volume :
157
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of Internal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104302345