Back to Search Start Over

LOGIC-insulin algorithm-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control during critical illness: the LOGIC-1 single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors :
Van Herpe T
Mesotten D
Wouters PJ
Herbots J
Voets E
Buyens J
De Moor B
Van den Berghe G
Van Herpe, Tom
Mesotten, Dieter
Wouters, Pieter J
Herbots, Jeroen
Voets, Evy
Buyens, Jo
De Moor, Bart
Van den Berghe, Greet
Source :
Diabetes Care; Feb2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p188-194, 7p
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>Tight blood glucose control (TGC) in critically ill patients is difficult and labor intensive, resulting in poor efficacy of glycemic control and increased hypoglycemia rate. The LOGIC-Insulin computerized algorithm has been developed to assist nurses in titrating insulin to maintain blood glucose levels at 80-110 mg/dL (normoglycemia) and to avoid severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL). The objective was to validate clinically LOGIC-Insulin relative to TGC by experienced nurses.<bold>Research Design and Methods: </bold>The investigator-initiated LOGIC-1 study was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trial in a single tertiary referral center. A heterogeneous mix of 300 critically ill patients were randomized, by concealed computer allocation, to either nurse-directed glycemic control (Nurse-C) or algorithm-guided glycemic control (LOGIC-C). Glycemic penalty index (GPI), a measure that penalizes both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic deviations from normoglycemia, was the efficacy outcome measure, and incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) was the safety outcome measure.<bold>Results: </bold>Baseline characteristics of 151 Nurse-C patients and 149 LOGIC-C patients and study times did not differ. The GPI decreased from 12.4 (interquartile range 8.2-18.5) in Nurse-C to 9.8 (6.0-14.5) in LOGIC-C (P < 0.0001). The proportion of study time in target range was 68.6 ± 16.7% for LOGIC-C patients versus 60.1 ± 18.8% for Nurse-C patients (P = 0.00016). The proportion of severe hypoglycemic events was decreased in the LOGIC-C group (Nurse-C 0.13%, LOGIC-C 0%; P = 0.015) but not when considered as a proportion of patients (Nurse-C 3.3%, LOGIC-C 0%; P = 0.060). Sampling interval was 2.2 ± 0.4 h in the LOGIC-C group versus 2.5 ± 0.5 h in the Nurse-C group (P < 0.0001).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Compared with expert nurses, LOGIC-Insulin improved efficacy of TGC without increasing rate of hypoglycemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01495992
Volume :
36
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diabetes Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104301191
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0584