Back to Search Start Over

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Impedance Control and Temperature Control of Radiofrequency Interstitial Thermal Ablation for Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors :
Fukushima, Taito
Ikeda, Kenji
Kawamura, Yusuke
Sorin, Yushi
Hosaka, Tetsuya
Kobayashi, Masahiro
Saitoh, Satoshi
Sezaki, Hitomi
Akuta, Norio
Suzuki, Fumitaka
Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
Arase, Yasuji
Kumada, Hiromitsu
Source :
Oncology; Jun2015, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p47-52, 6p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objectives: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of impedance control of a radiofrequency interstitial thermal ablation system (RITA) used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Fifteen patients with hypervascular HCCs <20 mm in diameter were randomly treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using conventional temperature control (group A) or impedance control methods (group B). RITA needle electrodes were used in all cases. We compared ablation time, extent of lesion ablation, and energy use between the two groups. Results: The median long and short diameters of the axial cross sections of radiofrequency-induced necrotic areas visualized by CT were 32 mm (range, 26-36) and 25 mm (20-31) in group A and 32 mm (28-40) and 31 mm (24-37) in group B, respectively. The short diameter of group B patients was significantly greater than that of group A patients (p = 0.029). The median ablation time was 18.8 min in group A and 13.4 min in group B, thus significantly shorter in group B (p = 0.001). The energy requirement did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: Impedance control of the RITA system resulted in an increased size of the ablation zone and a decreased ablation time. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00302414
Volume :
89
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
103427980
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000375166