Back to Search Start Over

A Multicenter Randomized Comparative Trial of Implants with Different Abutment Interfaces to Replace Anterior Maxillary Single Teeth.

Authors :
Cooper, Lyndon F.
Reside, Glenn
Stanford, Clark
Barwacz, Chris
Feine, Jocelyne
Nader, Samer Abi
Scheyer, E. Todd
McGuire, Michael
Source :
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants; 2015, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p622-632, 11p, 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 7 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose: The implant-abutment interface may affect peri-implant mucosal architecture, and influence health and esthetics. The goal of this 1-year follow-up report of a 5-year clinical investigation was to examine the peri-implant mucosal tissue responses to different implant-abutment interface designs. Materials and Methods: Subjects requiring an anterior maxillary implant were recruited. Tooth extractions, with or without preservation or ridge augmentation procedures, were performed as required. After 5 months of healing, one of three different implant-abutment combinations (conical interface [CI] n = 48); flat-to-flat interface [FI] n = 49); or platform switch interface [PS] n = 44) was placed and provisionalized. Twelve weeks later, permanent crowns were placed and data gathered throughout the first year. Peri-implant mucosal architecture and bone levels were evaluated clinically, photographically, and radiographically. Results: At 1 year, seven FI and six PS implants failed and two FI and two PS implant participants were lost to follow-up, resulting in survival rates of 100% (CI), 85.7% (FI), and 86.4% (PS) (90.8% overall). Marginal bone level changes were -0.22 mm (CI, P < .05), -1.2 mm (FI, P < .05), and -1.32 mm (PS, P < .05) after 1 year. Marginal bone level stability (< 0.5-mm bone loss or gain) was recorded for 87% (CI), 8% (FI), and 27% (PS) of implants. Measurement of midbuccal mucosal zenith and papilla positions revealed no change in the mucosal positions and 0.2 to 0.3 mm of gain in papilla dimensions in all groups. Conclusion: Significant differences in marginal bone loss were observed among the three implant-abutment interfaces. At 1 year follow-up, changes in the buccal mucosal zenith position or papilla dimensions were not discernable. A continued longitudinal evaluation of peri-implant bone and mucosal changes around these different interfaces is ongoing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08822786
Volume :
30
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
103067835
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3772