Back to Search Start Over

Congenital heart anomaly in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a single-center experience.

Authors :
Ruano, R.
Javadian, P.
Kailin, J. A.
Maskatia, S. A.
Shamshirsaz, A. A.
Cass, D. L.
Zamora, I. J.
Sangi‐Haghpeykar, H.
Lee, T. C.
Ayres, N. A.
Mehollin‐Ray, A.
Cassady, C. I.
Fernandes, C.
Welty, S.
Belfort, M. A.
Olutoye, O. O.
Source :
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology; Jun2015, Vol. 45 Issue 6, p683-688, 6p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the impact of the presence of a congenital heart anomaly ( CHA) and its potential contribution to morbidity and mortality in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia ( CDH). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, prenatal and postnatal data of all newborns diagnosed with CDH between January 2004 and December 2012 in a single center were reviewed. Cases were classified into two groups: those with 'isolated' CDH and those with both CDH and CHA. Patients with CHA were further subclassified into those with a major or minor CHA based on the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 ( RACHS-1), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery ( STS-EACTS) scoring systems. Patients with associated non-cardiac anomalies, including 'syndromic cases', were excluded from the analysis. Primary and secondary outcomes were survival up to 1 year of age and a need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( ECMO), respectively. Results Of the 180 infants with CDH, 41 were excluded because of the presence of non-cardiac associated anomalies, 118 had isolated CDH and 21 had CDH with CHA (16 with minor and five with major CHA). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that the best cut-off for survival was when the score for CHA was ≤ 2 for both RACHS-1 (area under the curve ( AUC), 0.74 ( P = 0.04); sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 87.5%) and STS-EACTS ( AUC, 0.83 ( P = 0.03); sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 87.5%). Survival rate at 1 year was significantly lower in those with CHD and a major CHA (40.0%; P = 0.04) than in those with isolated CDH (77.1%) and those with CDH and a minor CHA (81.3%). We found no significant differences among the groups with regard to the need for ECMO. Conclusions In general, a milder form of CHA does not appear to have a negative impact on the survival of infants with CDH. However, mortality appears to be significantly higher in infants with CDH and a major form of CHA. The scoring systems appear to be useful as predictors for classifying the effects of CHA in this population of patients. Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09607692
Volume :
45
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
102990258
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14648