Back to Search
Start Over
Comparative effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy versus endocrine monotherapy among postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective chart review in community oncology practices in the US.
- Source :
- Current Medical Research & Opinion; Jun2015, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p1095-1103, 9p
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Everolimus-based therapy and endocrine monotherapy are used among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) whose disease progressed or recurred on a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). However, limited evidence exists regarding the real-world comparative effectiveness of these agents. Methods: This retrospective chart review examined postmenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC patients in community-based oncology practices who received everolimus-based therapy or endocrine monotherapy (index therapy) as any line of therapy for mBC between 1 July 2012 and 15 April 2013 after NSAI failure. Time on treatment (TOT), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to chemotherapy (TTC) from index therapy initiation were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 243 and 270 patients received everolimus-based therapy or endocrine monotherapy in a quotabased sample. Patients treated with everolimus-based therapy had a higher proportion of visceral metastases, high tumor burden, and use of prior chemotherapies for mBC. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer TOT (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.51-0.87) and PFS (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.98) than endocrine monotherapy. No significant difference was found between everolimus-based therapy and endocrine monotherapy in TTC (HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.52-1.27). Results stratified by line of therapy were generally consistent with the overall results. Limitations: Limitations include recall and information bias with potentially absent or erroneous chart data, unobserved factors due to non-randomization, inability to measure outcome assessments paired with measuring outcomes prior to exposures, and potential patient selection bias associated with chart review. Conclusions: Among a nationwide sample of postmenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC patients treated in community oncology settings, treatment with everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer TOT and PFS compared to endocrine monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03007995
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Current Medical Research & Opinion
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 102915870
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2015.1021906