Back to Search Start Over

VMAT technique enables concomitant radiotherapy of prostate cancer and pelvic bone metastases.

Authors :
Kiljunen, Timo
Kangasmäki, Aki
Aaltonen, Aili
Kairemo, Kalevi
Partanen, Kaarina
Joensuu, Greetta
Alanko, Tuomo
Vaalavirta, Leila
Joensuu, Timo
Source :
Acta Oncologica; Jun2015, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p847-853, 7p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background. Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with metastatic disease often suffer from skeletal pain and urinary retention impairing their quality of life. Prophylactic radiotherapy to bone metastases planned concomitantly with primary PCa radiotherapy could enable more precise control of combined dose in healthy tissues when compared to sequential palliative treatment. Materials and methods. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was planned for 14 PCa patients with primary bone metastases. The bone planning target volume (PTV<subscript>bone</subscript>) was contoured together with the PTVs of prostate (pr), pelvic lymph nodes (ln) and seminal vesicles (sv). Another virtual plan was calculated excluding PTV<subscript>bone</subscript> for dose volume histogram (DVH) comparison. DVHs were additionally compared to a set of actual VMAT treatment plans of a control cohort of 13 high risk PCa patients treated with PTV<subscript>pr</subscript>, PTV<subscript>sv</subscript> and PTV<subscript>ln</subscript>. The prescribed doses varied between 42 and 76 Gy for PTV<subscript>bone</subscript>. Results. Recommended healthy tissue tolerances (Quantec) were not exceeded except for one patient's rectum V<subscript>50Gy</subscript> value. Rectum doses did not increase significantly due to the inclusion of PTV<subscript>bone</subscript>. For bladder, there was a slight increase for V<subscript>65Gy</subscript> and V<subscript>50Gy</subscript> (2.7% and 7.4%). The DVHs of metastatic and non-metastatic patients were comparable. There were no differences in the PTV<subscript>pr</subscript> DVH parameters, while mean PTV<subscript>ln</subscript> dose increased by 3.7 Gy-4.4 Gy due to the increased treatment volume related to PTV<subscript>bone</subscript>. All side effects were < grade 3 during the mean follow-up duration of 25 months. Conclusions. VMAT offers a good optimization tool for adding extra PTVs to the radiotherapy plan. Radiotherapy of bone metastases concomitantly with irradiation of the primary prostate tumor is a safe and well-tolerated approach and deserves to be studied in a randomized setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0284186X
Volume :
54
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Acta Oncologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
102664802
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.962665