Back to Search Start Over

Ermittlung der Empirie. Zu Ernst Machs Methode des Gedankenexperiments.

Authors :
Krauthausen, Karin
Source :
Berichte zur Wissenschafts-Geschichte; Mar2015, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p15-40, 26p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The paper argues that Ernst Mach's conception of the thought experiment from 1897/1905 holds a singular position in the lively discussions and repeated theorizations that have continued up to the present in relation to this procedure. Mach derives the thought experiment from scientific practice, and does not oppose it to the physical experiment, but, on the contrary, endows it with a robust relation to the facts. For Mach, the thought experiment is a reliable means of determining empiricism, and at the same time a real, because open and unbiased, experimenting. To shed light on this approach, the paper carries out a close reading of the relevant texts in Mach's body of writings (in their different stages of revision) and proceeds in three steps: first, Mach's processual understanding of science will be presented, which also characterizes his research and publication practice (I. 'Aperçu' and 'Sketch'. Science as Process and Projection); then in a second step the physiological and biological justification and valorization of memory and association will be examined with which Mach limits the relevance of categories such as consciousness and will (II. The Biology of Consciousness. Or The Polyp Colony); against this background, thirdly, the specific empiricism can be revealed that Mach inscribes into the thought experiment by on the one hand founding it in the memory and association, and on the other by tracing it back to geometry, which he deploys as an experimenting oriented to experience (III. Thinking and Experience. The Thought Experiment). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
German
ISSN :
01706233
Volume :
38
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Berichte zur Wissenschafts-Geschichte
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
101315052
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201501705