Back to Search Start Over

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy is Safe and Effective in Elderly Patients: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors :
Burchett, Michael
McKenna, Daniel
Selzer, Don
Choi, Jennifer
Mattar, Samer
Source :
Obesity Surgery; Feb2015, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p222-228, 7p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is gaining widespread popularity as a definitive bariatric operation that provides satisfactory and durable weight loss as well as comorbidity resolution. Although SG is being increasingly offered to patients of all ages, there is a paucity of reported outcomes in patients ≥62 years of age. The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the outcomes of SG in patients >62 years versus a younger age group, with an emphasis on safety and efficacy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed from a prospectively collected database on patients who underwent SG from 2007 to 2012. All patients who were ≥62 years old were compared to those <62 years. Results: There were 182 patients who underwent SG, 17 of whom were ≥62 years old. There were no significant differences in demographics or comorbidity characteristics between the groups. The mean follow-up was 1 year. There was no 30-day mortality in either group. The percent excess weight loss for the younger age group was 44 ± 21 % and the older group was 44 ± 25 %. The percent total body weight loss was 22 ± 10 and 21 ± 10 %, respectively. Weight loss outcomes were maintained for up to 3 years. Comorbidity resolution and improvement rates were equivalent in both groups. Conclusions: SG is safe and effective in patients ≥62 years. Weight loss and the beneficial effects on comorbidities are equivalent among elderly and younger patients. SG should be offered to elderly patients who are deemed to be appropriate candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09608923
Volume :
25
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Obesity Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100491203
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1421-9