Back to Search Start Over

Genome-wide association study for refractive astigmatism reveals genetic co-determination with spherical equivalent refractive error: the CREAM consortium.

Authors :
Wojciechowski, Robert
Verhoeven, Virginie
Ikram, Mohammad
Höhn, René
Hewitt, Alex
Cheng, Ching-Yu
St Pourcain, Beaté
McMahon, George
Kemp, John
Rahi, Jugnoo
Cumberland, Phillippa
Wedenoja, Juho
Schillert, Arne
Mirshahi, Alireza
Yip, Shea
Hofman, Albert
Uitterlinden, André
Rivadeneira, Fernando
Teo, Yik-Ying
Tai, E.
Source :
Human Genetics; Feb2015, Vol. 134 Issue 2, p131-146, 16p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

To identify genetic variants associated with refractive astigmatism in the general population, meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies were performed for: White Europeans aged at least 25 years (20 cohorts, N = 31,968); Asian subjects aged at least 25 years (7 cohorts, N = 9,295); White Europeans aged <25 years (4 cohorts, N = 5,640); and all independent individuals from the above three samples combined with a sample of Chinese subjects aged <25 years ( N = 45,931). Participants were classified as cases with refractive astigmatism if the average cylinder power in their two eyes was at least 1.00 diopter and as controls otherwise. Genome-wide association analysis was carried out for each cohort separately using logistic regression. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model. In the older European group the most strongly associated marker was downstream of the neurexin-1 ( NRXN1) gene (rs1401327, P = 3.92E−8). No other region reached genome-wide significance, and association signals were lower for the younger European group and Asian group. In the meta-analysis of all cohorts, no marker reached genome-wide significance: The most strongly associated regions were, NRXN1 (rs1401327, P = 2.93E−07), TOX (rs7823467, P = 3.47E−07) and LINC00340 (rs12212674, P = 1.49E−06). For 34 markers identified in prior GWAS for spherical equivalent refractive error, the beta coefficients for genotype versus spherical equivalent, and genotype versus refractive astigmatism, were highly correlated ( r = −0.59, P = 2.10E−04). This work revealed no consistent or strong genetic signals for refractive astigmatism; however, the TOX gene region previously identified in GWAS for spherical equivalent refractive error was the second most strongly associated region. Analysis of additional markers provided evidence supporting widespread genetic co-susceptibility for spherical and astigmatic refractive errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03406717
Volume :
134
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Human Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100372714
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-014-1500-y