Back to Search Start Over

Finger volume pulse waveforms facilitate reliable assessment of heart rate variability, but not blood pressure variability or baroreflex function.

Authors :
Linder, Jonathan R.
Stauss, Harald M.
Gindes, Holly
Pierce, Gary L.
Von Bergen, Nicholas H.
Haynes, William G.
Fiedorowicz, Jess G.
Source :
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders; 2014, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p84-98, 15p, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background We sought to determine whether heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP) variability, and baroreceptor-heart rate reflex sensitivity can be reliably assessed using finger volume pulse waveforms obtained from the commercially available EndoPAT device. Methods Non-invasive BP (Finometer Pro as a non-invasive standard) and finger volume (EndoPAT) waveforms were recorded in 65 adults (37 ± 14 years; 60% female) and systolic BP and heart rate (HR) time series were derived after calibrating the EndoPAT signal based on systolic and diastolic BP values obtained by a sphygomomanometer. Transfer function analyses were performed to test for coherence between systolic BP and HR time series derived from the Finometer and EndoPAT devices. Time-domain HRV parameters, frequency domain HR and systolic BP variability parameters, and baroreflex sensitivity (sequence technique) were computed from Finometer- and EndoPAT-derived time series and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Results Squared coherence between systolic BP time series derived from the Finometer and EndoPAT devices was low, suggesting poor correlation. In contrast, squared coherence between HR time series derived from the two devices was excellent [High Frequency (HF) = 0.80, Low Frequency (LF) = 0.81], with gain values close to 1.0. ICC values for time- and frequency-domain HRV parameters were excellent (>0.9 except for relative HF HRV, which was 0.77), while ICC values for frequency-domain BP variability parameters and baroreceptor-HR reflex sensitivity were low. Conclusions Finger volume pulse waveforms can be used to reliably assess both time-domain and frequency-domain HR variability. However, frequency domain BP variability parameters cannot be reliably assessed from finger volume pulse waveforms using the simple calibration technique used in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712261
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100346300
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-180