Back to Search Start Over

Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search.

Authors :
Gnanaseelan, Roshani
Gonzalez, Dave A.
Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
Source :
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience; Nov2014, Vol. 8, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of binocular vision during a prehension task performed in a visually enriched environment where the target object was surrounded by distractors/obstacles. Fifteen adults reached and grasped for a cylindrical peg while eye movements and upper limb kinematics were recorded. The complexity of the visual environment was manipulated by varying the number of distractors and by varying the saliency of the target. Gaze behavior (i.e., the latency of the primary gaze shift and frequency of gaze shifts prior to reach initiation) was comparable between viewing conditions. In contrast, a binocular advantage was evident in performance accuracy. Specifically, participants picked up the wrong object twice as often during monocular viewing when the complexity of the environment increased. Reach performance was more efficient during binocular viewing, which was demonstrated by shorter reach reaction time and overall movement time. Reaching movements during the approach phase had higher peak velocity during binocular viewing. During monocular viewing reach trajectories exhibited a direction bias during the acceleration phase, which was leftward during left eye viewing and rightward during right eye viewing. This bias can be explained by the presence of esophoria in the covered eye. The grasping interval was also extended by ~20% during monocular viewing; however, the duration of the return phase after the target was picked up was comparable across viewing conditions. In conclusion, binocular vision provides important input for planning and execution of prehension movements in visually enriched environments. Binocular advantage was evident, regardless of set size or target saliency, indicating that adults plan their movements more cautiously during monocular viewing, even in relatively simple environments with a highly salient target. Nevertheless, in visually-normal adults monocular input provides sufficient information to engage in online control to correct the initial errors in movement planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16625161
Volume :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100329277
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00959