Inhibitors of messenger RNA and protein synthesis affect differently serotonin arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase activity in clock-controlled and non clock-controlled fish pineal.

The pineal organ of fish contains photoreceptor cells. In some species (e.g., pike) each photoreceptor is a cellular circadian system which contains a photoreceptive unit, the clock and an output unit. In others (e.g., trout) the clock is lacking. The main rhythmic output of the pineal photoreceptor is melatonin, an internal 'zeitgeber' of the organisms. The nocturnal rise in melatonin secretion results from an increase in the activity of the arylalkylamine-N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT) which converts serotonin to N-acetylserotonin. In the present study we investigated the effects of transcription and translation inhibitors on AA-NAT activity in pike and trout pineal organs in culture. Cycloheximide, anisomycin, and puromycin inhibited the rise in AA-NAT activity observed during the first 2, 4 or 6 h of the dark phase, in both species. Actinomycin D was active only in the pike. Six hours of treatment during the first half of the night induced inhibition of AA-NAT activity, providing that forskolin (an adenylyl cyclase stimulator) was present in the culture medium. When the treatment was run for 3, 6 or 12 h, starting at midday of a 12L/12D cycle, basal and forskolin-stimulated AA-NAT activity (measured at midnight) were dramatically reduced. Such a treatment had no effect on trout AA-NAT activity. It is concluded that: (1) the dark-induced rise in AA-NAT activity and melatonin secretion are dependent on newly synthesized protein in both pike and trout pineal; (2) AA-NAT regulation takes place at the translational and post-translational levels in both species; (3) AA-NAT regulation occurs also at the transcriptional level in the pike, but not in the trout; and (4) the cAMP-dependent activation of AA-NAT requires transcription in the pike, not in the trout. The presence of a cell population acting as a circadian clock in the pike pineal, but not in the trout pineal, can explain the difference between these two species. Thus, we suggest that the clock mechanism operates at the genetic level in these cells. Further comparative studies between clock-controlled and non-clock-controlled pineals might prove interesting to demonstrate the difference between these two regulatory pathways.
(Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.)