Back to Search
Start Over
The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension.
- Source :
-
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 1998 Mar 05; Vol. 338 (10), pp. 645-52. - Publication Year :
- 1998
-
Abstract
- Background: It has recently been reported that the use of calcium-channel blockers for hypertension may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Because this issue remains controversial, we studied the incidence of such complications in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertension who were randomly assigned to treatment with either the calcium-channel blocker nisoldipine or the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor enalapril as part of a larger study.<br />Methods: The Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) Trial is a prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing the effects of moderate control of blood pressure (target diastolic pressure, 80 to 89 mm Hg) with those of intensive control of blood pressure (diastolic pressure, 75 mm Hg) on the incidence and progression of complications of diabetes. The study also compared nisoldipine with enalapril as a first-line antihypertensive agent in terms of the prevention and progression of complications of diabetes. In the current study, we analyzed data on a secondary end point (the incidence of myocardial infarction) in the subgroup of patients in the ABCD Trial who had hypertension.<br />Results: Analysis of the 470 patients in the trial who had hypertension (base-line diastolic blood pressure, > or = 90 mm Hg) showed similar control of blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid concentrations, and smoking behavior in the nisoldipine group (237 patients) and the enalapril group (233 patients) throughout five years of follow-up. Using a multiple logistic-regression model with adjustment for cardiac risk factors, we found that nisoldipine was associated with a higher incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarctions (a total of 24) than enalapril (total, 4) (risk ratio, 9.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.7 to 33.8).<br />Conclusions: In this population of patients with diabetes and hypertension, we found a significantly higher incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction among those assigned to therapy with the calcium-channel blocker nisoldipine than among those assigned to receive enalapril. Since our findings are based on a secondary end point, they will require confirmation.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors adverse effects
Calcium Channel Blockers adverse effects
Cardiovascular Diseases etiology
Cardiovascular Diseases mortality
Cardiovascular Diseases prevention & control
Double-Blind Method
Enalapril adverse effects
Female
Humans
Hypertension complications
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction mortality
Myocardial Infarction prevention & control
Nisoldipine adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use
Calcium Channel Blockers therapeutic use
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications
Enalapril therapeutic use
Hypertension drug therapy
Myocardial Infarction etiology
Nisoldipine therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0028-4793
- Volume :
- 338
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The New England journal of medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 9486993
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199803053381003