Back to Search
Start Over
Valve repair versus replacement for mitral insufficiency: when is a mechanical valve still indicated?
- Source :
-
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 1998 Feb; Vol. 115 (2), pp. 389-94; discussion 394-6. - Publication Year :
- 1998
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Although many advantages of mitral valve reconstruction have been demonstrated, whether specific subgroups of patients exist in whom mechanical valve replacement offers advantages over mitral reconstruction remains undetermined.<br />Methods: This study examined the late results of mitral valve surgery in patients with mitral insufficiency who received either a St. Jude Medical valve (n = 514) or a mitral valve reconstruction with ring annuloplasty (n = 725) between 1980 and 1996.<br />Results: Overall operative mortality was 7.2% in the patients receiving a St. Jude Medical mitral valve and 5.4% in those undergoing mitral valve reconstruction (no significant difference); isolated mortality was 2.5% in the St. Jude Medical group and 2.2% in the valve reconstruction group (no significant difference). The follow-up interval was more than 5 years for 340 patients with a mean of 39.8 months (98.5% complete). Overall 8-year freedom from late cardiac death, reoperation, and all valve-related complications was 72.8% for the St. Jude Medical group and 64.8% for valve reconstruction group (no significant difference). For patients with isolated, nonrheumatic mitral valve disease, 8-year freedom from late cardiac death and reoperation was better in the mitral valve reconstruction group (88.3%) than in the St. Jude Medical valve group (86.0%; p = 0.05). Furthermore, Cox proportional hazards regression revealed that mitral valve reconstruction was independently associated with a lesser incidence of late cardiac death (p = 0.04), irrespective of preoperative New York Heart Association class. However, the St. Jude Medical valve offered better 8-year freedom from late cardiac death, reoperation, and all valve-related complications than did mitral valve reconstruction in patients with multiple valve disease (77.0% vs 45.3%; p < 0.01).<br />Conclusions: Therefore, mitral valve reconstruction appears to be the procedure of choice for isolated, nonrheumatic disease, whereas insertion of a St. Jude Medical valve should be preferred for patients with multiple valve disease.
- Subjects :
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures methods
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Diseases surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mitral Valve Insufficiency etiology
Mitral Valve Insufficiency mortality
Proportional Hazards Models
Reoperation
Rheumatic Heart Disease complications
Treatment Outcome
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Mitral Valve surgery
Mitral Valve Insufficiency surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0022-5223
- Volume :
- 115
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 9475534
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70283-1