Back to Search Start Over

[Comparison of scanners and porto-scanners, both in helical mode, for the study of hepatic metastases. Prospective study in 12 patients].

Authors :
Vullierme MP
Abdelouafi A
Vilgrain V
Denys A
Sibert A
Menu Y
Source :
Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique [Gastroenterol Clin Biol] 1997; Vol. 21 (4), pp. 254-8.
Publication Year :
1997

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare helical CTAP and helical CT-scan in the preoperative assessment of liver metastases.<br />Methods: A prospective unicentric study in 12 patients was performed with helical CTAP and helical CT-scan. All patients underwent partial hepatectomy with intraoperative palpation and sonography within 19 days (mean: 9 days).<br />Results: Examination of resected liver specimens found 38 metastases, from colorectal cancer in 36 cases. The sensitivity was 92.1% for helical CTAP and 79% for helical CT-scan. This sensitivity was 85% for helical CTAP and 60% for helical CT-scan for nodules 1 cm or less in diameter (P = 0.08).<br />Conclusion: In the preoperative screening of liver metastases, helical CT-scan should be performed as the first choice examination. When hepatic lesions seem to be curable by resection based on helical dynamic CT-scan results, helical CTAP should be performed to increase the sensitivity of detection of lesions 1 cm or less in diameter.

Details

Language :
French
ISSN :
0399-8320
Volume :
21
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
9207991