Back to Search
Start Over
Intravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5% articaine, 0.5% lidocaine, or 0.5% prilocaine. A double-blind randomized clinical study.
- Source :
-
Regional anesthesia [Reg Anesth] 1997 Jan-Feb; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 29-34. - Publication Year :
- 1997
-
Abstract
- Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three local anesthetic agents for intravenous regional anesthesia in the upper limb. Side effects and plasma concentrations of the drugs in the doses administered for IVRA were also studied.<br />Methods: Thirty patients in ASA groups I and II received intravenous regional anesthesia for surgery of the upper limb. In a double-blind prospective study, they were randomly allocated to receive one of three local anesthetics: articaine, lidocaine, or prilocaine. Patients received 40 mL of a 0.5% solution of the local anesthetic. The onset time of sensory block was assessed by pinprick and the extent of motor block was was scored as 0-3. Plasma concentrations of local anesthetics were determined in all patients from serial arterial blood samples drawn at predetermined times before and after tourniquet release.<br />Results: The onset time of sensory block was significantly shorter (2.5 minutes) in the articaine group than in the lidocaine group (11.1 minutes) or the prilocaine group (10.9 minutes) (Scheffe, P < .05). Development of motor block was equal in all three groups (score 2). Estimation of plasma concentrations by high performance liquid chromatography showed that the peak level in all 30 patients was reached immediately after release of the tourniquet; plasma concentrations thereafter gradually declined. Maximum concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine were, 1.85, 8.5, and 4.4 micrograms/mL, respectively. No signs of local anesthetic toxicity of the cardiovascular or central nervous systems were seen.<br />Conclusion: Articaine had the fastest onset of sensory block and the lowest peak plasma concentration of the three local anesthetics when used for intravenous regional anesthesia.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Anesthesia, Conduction adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Injections, Intravenous
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Anesthesia, Conduction methods
Anesthetics, Local adverse effects
Anesthetics, Local blood
Anesthetics, Local pharmacokinetics
Carticaine adverse effects
Carticaine blood
Carticaine pharmacokinetics
Lidocaine adverse effects
Lidocaine blood
Lidocaine pharmacokinetics
Prilocaine adverse effects
Prilocaine blood
Prilocaine pharmacokinetics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0146-521X
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Regional anesthesia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 9010944
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1098-7339(06)80053-2