Back to Search Start Over

Is delayed surgery really better for congenital diaphragmatic hernia?: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors :
de la Hunt MN
Madden N
Scott JE
Matthews JN
Beck J
Sadler C
Barrett AM
Boddy SA
Bray RJ
Cusick E
Gardner L
Hargrave SA
Hinton W
Rangecroft L
Spicer R
Stafford M
Thomas D
Vallis CJ
Wagget J
Source :
Journal of pediatric surgery [J Pediatr Surg] 1996 Nov; Vol. 31 (11), pp. 1554-6.
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

Delayed surgery has become widely accepted in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia after comparing outcomes only with historical retrospective controls. It was the aim of this study to compare early and delayed hernia repair in a randomized prospective clinical trial. Fifty-four infants were randomized to receive either early repair (within 4 hours of admission) or delayed repair (more than 24 hours after birth). The survival rate was higher for the delayed group (57% v 46%), but the difference was not significant (difference: -11; 95% confidence limits: -37.5, 15.5). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to length of hospital stay, ventilator dependency, or survival time. Recorded preoperative risk factors were similar for the two groups. Eight infants in the delayed repair group died without having undergone surgery. The optimum time for surgery still needs clarification.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0022-3468
Volume :
31
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of pediatric surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8943121
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90176-1