Back to Search
Start Over
Is delayed surgery really better for congenital diaphragmatic hernia?: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
- Source :
-
Journal of pediatric surgery [J Pediatr Surg] 1996 Nov; Vol. 31 (11), pp. 1554-6. - Publication Year :
- 1996
-
Abstract
- Delayed surgery has become widely accepted in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia after comparing outcomes only with historical retrospective controls. It was the aim of this study to compare early and delayed hernia repair in a randomized prospective clinical trial. Fifty-four infants were randomized to receive either early repair (within 4 hours of admission) or delayed repair (more than 24 hours after birth). The survival rate was higher for the delayed group (57% v 46%), but the difference was not significant (difference: -11; 95% confidence limits: -37.5, 15.5). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to length of hospital stay, ventilator dependency, or survival time. Recorded preoperative risk factors were similar for the two groups. Eight infants in the delayed repair group died without having undergone surgery. The optimum time for surgery still needs clarification.
- Subjects :
- Blood Gas Analysis
England epidemiology
Hernia, Diaphragmatic blood
Hernia, Diaphragmatic complications
Hernia, Diaphragmatic mortality
Hernia, Diaphragmatic pathology
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Length of Stay
Lung abnormalities
Prospective Studies
Respiration, Artificial
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Hernia, Diaphragmatic surgery
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0022-3468
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of pediatric surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 8943121
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90176-1