Back to Search Start Over

Lack of effect of CCKB receptor antagonists in ethological and conditioned animal screens for anxiolytic drugs.

Authors :
Dawson GR
Rupniak NM
Iversen SD
Curnow R
Tye S
Stanhope KJ
Tricklebank MD
Source :
Psychopharmacology [Psychopharmacology (Berl)] 1995 Sep; Vol. 121 (1), pp. 109-17.
Publication Year :
1995

Abstract

The effects of the CCKB receptor antagonists L-365,260, CI-988 and L-740,093, a new compound with improved bioavailability and CNS penetration, were assessed for anxiolytic-like effects in three rat anxiolytic screens sensitive to benzodiazepines, the elevated plus maze (EPM), conditioned suppression of drinking (CSD) and conditioned emotional response (CER) tests. In the EPM, L-740,093 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), L-365,260 (0.00001-10.0 mg/kg), and CI-988 (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) did not increase the time spent on the open arms of the maze or the number of entries onto the open arms. In contrast, the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist, bretazenil (0.3-10.0 mg/kg), significantly increased both the time spent on the open arms and the number of open arm entries. In the CSD and the CER tests, L-740,093 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) L-365,260 (0.0001-0.1 mg/kg) and CI-988 (0.01-10.0 mg/kg) failed to increase suppression ratios compared to the vehicle-treated control rats, whereas, the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist FG 8205 (10.0 mg/kg) (CSD) and bretazenil (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) (CER) both significantly increased suppression ratios compared to vehicle-treated control rats. In addition, L-365,260 (1.0-50.0 mg/kg), CI-988 (0.1-10.0 mg/kg) and diazepam (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) were assessed in a squirrel monkey conflict procedure. Although diazepam significantly increased suppressed lever pressing rates, L-365,260 and CI-988 were without effect. The present findings provide little support for the hypothesis that CCKB receptor antagonists have anti-anxiety effects in animals.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0033-3158
Volume :
121
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Psychopharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8539335
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245597