Do risk factor interventions prevent or reverse arteriosclerosis?

We have attempted to summarize the current controversies regarding risk factors and preventive measures for control of arteriosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Recognizing that the genesis and development of the disease process are extremely complex and the basic knowledge is limited, it is not likely that conclusive answers to questions will be forthcoming soon which will provide more effective preventive or therapeutic measures. It might be desirable to institute educational and control program aimed at curtailing, at a young age, known AS risk factors such as heavy smoking, particularly if the family history indicates severe risk. Few will question the normal approaches to the treatment of complications of coronary heart disease by control of hypertension, elevated cholesterol, and smoking. However, great caution must be exercised when trying to institute large scale modifications in prevailing life patterns, particularly when based on indefinite risk factor studies and in the face of potentially profound and frequently unknown consequences. The unknowns of atherosclerotic heart disease risk factors, coupled with uncertainties and even doubts about protracted and expensive population studies, lead us to propose an emphasis on alternate selective approaches. We strongly believe that fundamental to progress in the field of arteriosclerosis is an amplification of preventive research efforts with stronger attention focused upon influencing the atherosclerotic processes within the arterial wall. But, more immediately, we urge systematic gathering and careful evaluation of patient data in particular population subsets which exhibit and accelerated mode of arteriosclerosis. Comparative studies of patients, particularly twins, families, and ethnic populations with redilection to early or accelerated arteriosclerosis may be extremely rewarding. Our repeated review of the enormous literature suggests that worldwide collaboration is needed to perfect more meaningful protocols as well as to correlate and critically evaluate existing data provided by population studies of this insidious disease process which represents an evermounting burden to society.