Back to Search Start Over

Ancrod versus heparin for anticoagulation during vascular surgical procedures.

Authors :
Cole CW
Bormanis J
Luna GK
Hajjar G
Barber GG
Harris KA
Brien WF
Source :
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 1993 Feb; Vol. 17 (2), pp. 288-92; discussion 293.
Publication Year :
1993

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the conduct and early results of infrainguinal vascular reconstructions with use of ancrod or heparin for anticoagulation.<br />Methods: To test the hypothesis that ancrod was an effective alternative to heparin, 28 patients requiring infrainguinal bypass surgery were randomized to receive heparin during operation or ancrod before operation over a period of 12 hours to deplete circulating fibrinogen (0.2 to 0.5 gm/L).<br />Results: No clotting of blood within the grafts or native vessels was noted during the conduct of the surgical procedures in either group. No excessive bleeding was detected during operation in either group. The operative procedure, complication rate, and hospital course were also indistinguishable; patency at 1 month was also equal.<br />Conclusion: Fibrinogen depletion with ancrod provides anticoagulation for the conduct of infrainguinal vascular reconstructions that is as effective as heparin. When heparin is contraindicated ancrod is an effective and safe alternative.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0741-5214
Volume :
17
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8433424
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.42069