[Comparison of portal CT, arterial CT and CT with intravenous contrast media in the diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma].

Sixty-nine patients underwent CT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All subjects were examined with CT before and after bolus injection of contrast medium: 42 HCCs were detected. 13/42 patients underwent also CT arteriography (contrast medium in the hepatic artery) and 29/42 were submitted to CT during arterial portography (contrast medium in the superior mesenteric artery). The results of the three techniques were compared with each other and with surgical and pathologic findings. CT during arterial portography detected other lesions in 5/29 patients while it confirmed CT diagnosis in the extant 24 cases; CT arteriography recognized other lesions in 2/13 subjects while in the extant 11/13 it confirmed CT diagnosis. Both CT arteriography and CT during arterial portography affected treatment protocol in 16.2% of cases. The results had surgical confirmation in all patients but 3 in whom intraoperative US showed some nodules undetected earlier. All the lesions were hypodense on CT during arterial portography. On CT arteriography, they were hyperdense in 4/13 cases and hypodense with an irregular hyperdense halo in 9/13 cases. To conclude, CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography are better diagnostic tools than CT: nevertheless, they are invasive techniques and should be employed in selected cases only.