Evidence of a role for growth hormone, but not for insulin-like growth factors-I or -II in the growth of the neonatal rat.

Neonatal rats were injected with antiserum raised against either insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, rat growth hormone (rGH) or somatostatin (SRIF) on each of days 2-5 of life: controls received normal sheep immunoglobulin. Plasma levels of rGH and IGF-I were measured by radioimmunoassay and growth rates recorded. Neonatal administration of anti-rGH resulted in the suppression of plasma IGF-I levels at day 21 and of body weight gain compared with control animals from day 5 of age; relative growth velocity continued to diverge in the absence of any further treatment. Immunoneutralization of IGF-I or of IGF-II had no effect on growth rates of rats at any time during the experiment and had no effect upon plasma rGH concentrations at day 21. However, at day 7, plasma rGH was lower in anti-IGF-I-treated rats than in controls; in contrast, plasma rGH in anti-IGF-II-treated animals at day 7 was higher than in controls. Plasma levels of IGF-I at 49 days of age were similar regardless of the neonatal immunization treatment received. Anti-SRIF treatment of neonatal rats was associated with elevated rGH levels, but no significant stimulation of growth. These results indicated that growth hormone, but not circulating IGF-I or IGF-II are essential for normal growth in the neonatal rat.